• Home
  • Blog
  DANGEROUS TIMES
  • Home
  • Blog

9/12/2022

9/12/2022

2 Comments

 

Enamored of a Queen,
Is America wishing for
a King of our very own?

Picture
THE QUEEN at the Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, ending a 2007 U.S. tour. CREDIT: NASA
(NOTE: This post has been updated to emphasize the difference between ceremonial and actual monarchies).

I'M SORRY
that Queen Elizabeth is dead.
   And I understand the wall-to-wall, floor-to-ceiling, day-after-day, week-after-week, 24-7 news coverage, because there’s no such thing as proportional news.  There’s just no way to get the volume of the news right: it’s either too little, or way, way, way over the top.
   It’s sort of like the weather, never perfect. Of course, the difference between extreme news and extreme weather is that one morning, we’ll wake up, and, poof, Queen Elizabeth will have disappeared from our TV screens and front pages. But the hurricanes, floods, wildfires, mudslides, tornadoes of the modern era will be with us and getting worse until we either fix the climate or, alternatively, end up like the Queen.
    Look. I’m not a dolt. I realize that the Royal Family has a hold on the American psyche. We are fascinated. Who said What to Whom (or is it Whom said What to Who)? Who is the racist(s) in the Family? Will Harry and Meghan be re-enfolded into the Royal Fold? Explain to me Princess Anne, again? What to make of the latest cryptic dispatch from The Palace (In a land where Palaces speak)? Who’ll take care of the corgis? What’s a Consort?
   And, it's true: Queen Elizabeth had style.

MY PROBLEM IS WHY?
   Why are we so besotted bythe Royal Family?
   Didn’t we fight a war, crack the Liberty Bell, winter at Valley Forge, write a Constitution and pay a fortune to see “Hamilton” so we could be be rid of the Royals?
   It seems to me that the Queen, and now the King, are the polar opposites of what the United States of America is supposed to believe in, is supposed to be?
   Don't we believe in electing our leaders, not in DNA determinism mapped out on succession charts interpreted by soothsayers with British accents on loan to MSNBC, deciding who'll end up atop the national pyramid.
   We Americans believe in the Common Man, the Common Woman, the Common Nonbionary, not the aristocracy, the Super Rich, the cryptocrats and the kleptocrats.
   Yes, we want to be rich ourselves, but generally we don’t “like”  anyone else who is, except maybe The Deserving Rich, such as those who figured out same-day delivery, IOS 16 software and soft-serve ice cream.
   Or the thousands of 20-somethings granted fortunes to play in the NFL, NBA, MLB and the Premier  League. Or geniuses, who are truly meritorious and exceptional like Oprah, Taylor Swift and the Powerball winner who lives next door and darn well better remember who shoveled their sidewalks during the most savage winters.

Picture
QUEEN MARY, touring London's dockyard area with her granddaughters, Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret Rose, May 1939. CREDIT: Federal News Photos / Library and Archives Canada
 IT'S PRETTY CLEAR that  long, long ago, when Britain, England, the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth - collectively The Empire - really amounted to something, and that it was run by murderers,  militarists, racists, bullies and slave-runners – colonists, who exploited entire continents, but nowadays are left only with their pomp, their rituals,  their uncomfortable costumes and a history of shame that deserves no honor, celebration or emulation.
   What worries me is whether  that's what we want, too.
   A King.
   A functional one, as opposed to the ceremonial, symbolic variety.
   We’d settle for a Queen, of course.
   But a real King would be the real thing.
   Kings are easier. They know what to do. They’ll tell us how to think and when - or not. When to have an abortion, or, more to the point, when not to have an abortion. When we should  wear a mask, and better still, when not to wear one. What books to read; or,  better still, what books to ban; or even better, what books to burn.  Who should immigrate into the country, and better still, who should not.
   A King will know which people should live in what neighborhoods; who should go to jail; who should treated politely by the police.  Who should eat, who should be food-insecure. Who should be paid; who should be paid a lot; or not. Who should stay home; who should unload the dishwasher; who should own a dishwasher; our not.
   Democracy is hard. You have to make decisions, watch and/or read and listen to the news; have disagreements with your family and the people next door; go to city council meetings; donate to candidates; argue; settle for the lesser of two evils; figure out who’s telling the truth most of the time, or who’s lying the least. You have to worry who’ll win; worry whether you picked a loser; or worry that  you've elected a winner who later you realize should have lost.
   Having a loving, empathetic, wise boss and doing what he says is easier than belonging to a union, and, regardless of whether your union gets you decent pay, and either way, still,having to pay dues.

Picture
PRINCESS ELIZABETH, in the Auxiliary Territorial Service, the women's branch of the British army, April, 1945. She had been trained as a driver and mechanic. CREDIT: Imperial War Museums
 THE KING SYSTEM
   Under the King System, you're likely to get out of jury duty.
   By decree, there'll be no building codes.
   The King understands. He knows what to do. Leave it to him. Listen to what he says, then do it.
   It’s the most important issue to be decided in the election to be held this fast-approaching November, and again, in the fateful presidential election of 2024.
   Can we, should we, will we leave the headaches and heartaches and uncertainties, the anguish and hard work of democracy behind?
   Perhaps, unlike has-been England, with its fairy tale Queens and pretend Kings, maybe our country is still mighty enough, prosperous enough and mean and cruel enough to warrant the real thing, a genuine King of our very own.
   We could have Donald J. Trump and be done with it.

Picture
QUEEN ELIZABETH in Berlin, Germany, 2015. CREDIT: Berlin Police
2 Comments
Neale
9/13/2022 01:28:25 pm

Good column.

Although... there is a difference between a real King and a constitutional monarch King, and you don't seem to differentiate.

The last real King of Britain was George III. Remember him? Since then the King has been a symbol, a figurehead, with virtually no power, and always, always acting upon the advice of his (her) First Minister, who is democratically elected and responsible to a democratic assembly or House. I would argue that Britain and Canada, with its new King, is considerably more "democratic" than the US of A. Certainly Canada.

So, putting on my Canadian hat, I am somewhat offended by your grouping our dear, beloved late Liz with the man who shall not be named but only spelled T****. In my humble opinion the US would be better off with a King-- if a constitutional monarch and what goes with it, something like a parliamentary government in which the Prime Minister is responsible to an elected House, and vice versa, and the House is responsible to the people.

(Once you get rid of the filibuster you may get that.)

Reply
Brian Jones
9/13/2022 02:10:11 pm

Neale,
A good point. I thought I acknowledged the difference in monarchies, but that's the problem with writers. They think they know what they are writing, but the text tells a different story.

Since the Web is instantly malleable, I made a mid-course change in a key section, and acknowledged the "updating" at the top of the post, as if this were an actual publication operating under professional rules.

The text change:
IT'S PRETTY CLEAR that long, long ago, when Britain, England, the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth - collectively The Empire - really amounted to something, and that it was run by murderers, militarists, racists, bullies and slave-runners – colonists, who exploited entire continents, but nowadays are left only with their pomp, their rituals, their uncomfortable costumes and a history of shame that deserves no honor, celebration or emulation.
What worries me is whether that's what we want, too.
A King.
A functional one, as opposed to the ceremonial, symbolic variety.
We’d settle for a Queen, of course.
But a real King would be the real thing.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    BRIAN C. JONES
    Picture
      I'VE BEEN a reporter and writer for 58 years, long  enough to have  learned that journalists don't know very much, although I've met some smart ones. 
      Mainly, what reporters know comes from asking other people questions and fretting about the answers.
       This blog is a successor to one inspired by our dog, Phoebe, who was smart, sweet and the antithesis of Donald Trump. She died Feb. 3, and I don't see getting over that very soon.
       Occasionally, I may try to reach her via cell phone.


     

    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Blog